|
In this session we will discuss the advantages and disadvantages
of ABMs as compared to other modeling approaches (e.g. cellular
automata, dynamic systems models, spatial regression). Critically, we
will address how ABMs fit in an integrated research framework that
builds on what can be considered more traditional methods including
household surveys, statistical analysis, and GIS/RS. A key component to
this discussion will be the role of model calibration and validation in
the development of ABMs. Lastly, we will discuss tools used to design
and implement ABMS (e.g., Agent Analyst, RePast, Netlogo) and how to
lower the startup costs associated with building an ABM.
READINGS Evans, T. P., and Kelley, H. 2004. Multi-scale analysis of a household level agent-based model of landcover change. Journal of Environmental Management 72:57-72. Abstract | Publication Huigen, M. G. A. 2004. First principles of the MameLuke multi-actor modeling framework for land use change, illustrated with a Philippine case study. Journal of Environmental Management 72:5-21. Abstract | Publication Manson, S., and T. P. Evans. in press. Agent-based modeling of deforestation in southern Yucatán, Mexico, and reforestation in the Midwest United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. (paper not yet available) Parker, D. C., S. M. Manson, M. A. Janssen, M. J. Hoffmann, and P. Deadman. 2003. Multi-Agent System Models for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93:1-43. Abstract | Publication |
|
Copyright © Coweeta LTER. All rights reserved. |