Disturbance is the major factor influencing species composition, diversity, biomass, and productivity of southern Appalachian ecosystems. Disturbance intensity and impacts vary at a range of spatial and temporal scales. Primary natural disturbances in the southern Appalachians are fire, drought (Clinton et al. 1993), floods, hurricanes (Douglass and Hoover 1988), icestorms (Whitney and Johnson 1984), pathogens, and insects (Schowalter and Crossley 1988). On a longer time scale, debris avalanches and landslides are the major natural disturbances influencing land forming processes in the area (Grant 1988, Velbel 1988). Ecosystems often respond strongly to these disturbances. For example, amphibian survival, species richness, and abundance may be reduced in gaps (Petranka et al. 1993). Vegetation and vertebrate assemblages may change depending on disturbance intensity, forest age, and structure (Shugart 1984); and seston and biotic characteristics are influenced by changes in near-stream forests (Webster et al. 1988, 1992).
In combination with these natural disturbances, southern Appalachian ecosystems have been substantially influenced by humans for at least the last 6,000 years. On a regional basis, humans have permanently changed the landscape from a few to over fifty percent of the area. Human activities have also altered the atmospheric environment (i.e. acidic deposition and ozone) which has affected both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems (Swank and Waide 1988, Swank and Vose 1988). Fire exclusion, the extirpation of large predators, the introduction of non-native species, and direct and indirect manipulations to increase and maintain high populations of game species such as deer, grouse, turkey and trout, have further changed these ecosystems.
Superimposed on these disturbed landscapes, are strong environmental gradients which occur in response to variation in elevation, topography, aspect, and soils. For example, at Coweeta, mean annual temperature decreases by almost 5 oC from lower to higher elevations, while precipitation increases by 30 percent (Swift et al. 1988). These gradients lead to a partitioning of forest communities along topographic and elevational gradients (Figure 13). Biota also respond to medium and smaller-scale topographic variation, with species composition changing from ridge to sideslope to coves (Day et al. 1988), or along and within stream order gradients (Grubaugh 1994). At even finer scales, microsite variation in nutrient and water availability can greatly influence microflora and fauna. Temporal variation can also be substantial. For example, in the mid-1980's Coweeta experienced a record drought (Swift et al. 1988) which resulted in substantial mortality of canopy trees (Clinton et al. 1993, Smith 1991). Taken together, spatial and temporal variation in environmental driving variables creates a complex mosaic. Environmental heterogeneity interacts with disturbance through space and time. Some sites, because of their position along environmental gradients, are more prone to certain disturbances (i.e. ice damage occurs more frequently at cooler and higher elevations, windthrow is more likely on exposed slopes, drought mortality is more frequent on ridge sites and on coarse textured soils, and fires are more likely on dry, warm, low-elevation southern exposures). Disturbances also often have a direct effect on environmental heterogeneity by altering microclimatic conditions. For example in gaps created by overstory mortality, light increases in the forest floor. Some disturbances alter future probabilities of subsequent disturbances at the same or adjacent site. For example, intense fire reduces fuel loads and standing biomass, thereby decreasing fire likelihood for > 30 years. Fire probability will decrease not only on the burned site, but also for adjacent stands because recently burned stands serve as partial firebreaks for up to several decades.
To understand how this variation effects populations and ecosystem processes, we will continue to use a combination of long-term measurements, experiments, and modeling to characterize temporal and spatial variation in environmental conditions and interactions with disturbance from the plot to the region (Figure 14). As we continue to expand our research effort to the entire southern Appalachian region, we must also understand causes and consequences of historic and contemporary landscape change. At this scale, we hypothesize that land use is more important than environmental heterogeneity in influencing populations and processes. We will study factors influencing landscape change in the southern Appalachians at two temporal scales. At the scale of centuries to millennia, dramatic changes in species composition occurred in the region in response to changes in climate and, we hypothesize, in the regional fire regime. At the scale of decades during the last 50 years, landscape change reflects the effects of intensive human land-use, ranging from forest regeneration after widespread clearcutting early in this century to the recent changes in settlement patterns due to a decrease in agriculture and an increase in vacation/retirement home development. The ecological implications of this land-use change will be addressed in Sections IIC-D.
II.B.1. Historical fire regimes (Clark)
Fire may have long been an important control on vegetation composition, structure, and ecosystem function (e.g. C storage) in southeastern forests (Garren 1943, Quarterman and Keever 1963, Komarek 1968, Abrams 1992). Fire suppression is believed responsible for large changes in forest composition in the southern Appalachians (Abrams et al. 1995), including the expansion of Rhododendron that appears to have affected tree recruitment patterns (refer to II.C.2.c.). Unfortunately, we have little more than anecdotal evidence of pre-Contact fire importance (e.g. Pyne 1982, Silver 1990), because fire scars on trees (Harmon 1982, Harmon et al. 1983) have limited extent. It is thus impossible to assess how recent fire differs from that of the past and how sensitive fire regimes may be to climate variability, another focus of this proposal. We propose to build on analyses completed under initial support from the Augmentation grant to examine temporal and geographic variability in fire importance, from relatively low intensity cultural influences of pre-Cherokee times to the present. Analysis of sediment charcoal will contrast fire importances of cultural settings outlined below, and it will determine temporal and geographic variability for pre-Cherokee times. We will use pollen analysis to compare composition of 20th century "recovery" forests with presettlement forests. Together, fossil pollen and charcoal will be used to assess how representative are estimates of land use changes analyzed by (II.B.2.) and (II.B.3.), how changing fire importances may have affected C cycles analyzed in (II.D.3.a.), and how these recent influences depart from pre-Contact forests.
The paleo component of our proposal is motivated by recognition that modern vegetation dynamics and ecosystem function in our region play out against a backdrop of frequent and intense change. The southern Appalachians have been subjected to broad scale climate changes since the Pleistocene (Watts 1970, 1980, Delcourt and Delcourt 1984a, 1984b, Kneller and Peteet 1994). The long history of cultural exploitation includes low impact agriculture of DeSoto's time. By Contact, Cherokee had penetrated and rapidly expanded to become one the largest and most important North American tribes with a capital town situated just north of Coweeta at the mouth of the Little Tennessee (Rights 1991). Eighteenth century accounts describe the Little Tennessee Valley and surrounding areas as highly impacted by agriculture (Bartram 1792) and autumn burning for game (Rights 1991). Regional upheaval of the 18th and early 19th centuries were followed by increasingly intense agriculture, employing methods borrowed from Europeans. Census data and descriptions indicate broad-based agriculture shortly before Cherokee removal in 1838 (Swanton 1979). Subsistence agriculture, mostly by Europeans, and then logging was followed by 20th century forest recovery, the "wooded setting home market" (see II.B.3) and fire suppression.
Climate- (Clark et al. 1996) and human- (Clark and Royall 1995b, 1996) induced changes in fire importance can be traced with stratigraphic data and used to establish geographic patterns of past burning (Figure 1) and to show patterns of C release to the atmosphere (Clark and Royall 1994, 1995b, Clark 1996, Clark et al., in review). We have recently developed a semi-automated method of macroscopic particle characterization using image analysis that improves our estimates of mass fluxes of particles from the atmosphere (Clark and Hussey 1996). We developed and applied the method under our Augmentation award, demonstrating that good records of vegetation and climate change exist in the many peatlands scattered throughout our study region (e.g. Figure 1) (Lynch and Clark, in preparation). We propose to expand our analysis to twelve peatlands in the southern Appalachians, where we will concentrate pollen and charcoal analyses on the last several millennia. Coring, pollen, charcoal, and 14C analysis is underway. The limited budget requested for regional paleo analysis in this proposal will be supplemented by funds from Clark's Principal Young Investigator award. That award will provide 210Pb dating of sediment cores and supplement pollen and charcoal analysis we propose for new cores here.
II.B.2. Human-caused landcover change during the last half-century (Bolstad)
Humans have become the single largest disturbance agent in most landscapes, altering more vegetation and moving more soil than natural biotic and physical processes combined. The primary direct human disturbances in the southern Appalachians are forest harvesting for wood products and land conversion to agricultural or urban/suburban landuses. We hypothesize that the frequency, intensity, and extent of these two types of disturbance have changed over the last 50 years, due to both physical/biotic conditions and to policies, politics, and laws established during this time period. Furthermore, impacts of these changes in land-use cascade through both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems in the southern Appalachians. Land-use change data are crucial for developing and validating socio-economic models of factors causing land-use change (II.B.3) but also provide key sampling frames and data for other initiatives in this proposal, including research on carbon, nutrient, and water cycles (II.D.3), terrestrial ecosystem fragmentation and biotic diversity (II.C.1), and aquatic ecosystem response to disturbance (II.C.2). We have three objectives in this research: (1) obtain decadal time series of detailed land-use/landcover data from the 1940s until present, which include classes for forest (young and old), agriculture, old fields, and urban/suburban areas, (2) digitize time series and overlay to identify the range of land conversion/land-use characteristic size, location, and configuration, and to estimate conversion frequencies, and (3) identify land-use trajectories and identify key sampling frames for related studies within this proposal. We will use a combination of historical and current aerial photographs and satellite imagery to map landcover/land-use changes over the last 50 years. Photointerpretations of archival photographs for study areas will be digitized, registered to a standard coordinate system, and combined with terrain, soils, climate, and other environmental, infrastructure, and socio-economic data in a GIS. Time-series overlays will be used to calculate transition matrices and probabilities, and allow statistical characterization and modeling of land-use transitions, causes, and impacts.
II.B.3. Socio-economic drivers of land-use change (Arthaud, Wear, and Newman)
Historic and current land and resource uses are among the most direct and the most important forces affecting the composition and productivity of southern Appalachian ecosystems. Land uses are determined by both broad scale factors such as market prices for timber and agricultural products and local factors such as the topography, soil type, and location of a site. All of these factors are the basic inputs to landowners' decision making, through which they interact to define land use and vegetative patterns that vary over both space and time (Wear and Flamm 1993, Turner et al., in press). Understanding how these human decisions define landscape structure is essential for (1) identifying ecosystem risks and (2) defining strategies for achieving ecosystem level goals (Wear et al., in press).
Our current work focuses on explaining patterns of land use in the southern Appalachians using classical land use models, i.e. von Thunen-type land allocation models (Hall 1966, Samuelson 1983; this will be extended to explicitly address spatial factors. This work addresses the modern era of land-use dating to the 1940s and compares land use patterns across time periods. We propose to extend this work to:
II.B.3.a. Test how land use options at one point in time are influenced by the history of human endeavors at a site
We hypothesize that certain land uses may constrain options available in the future; e.g. an agricultural practice may result in a short-run depreciation of "natural capital" that may or may not be restored over time. Tests will be constructed by extending static land-use choice models to a dynamic framework that addresses the history of land uses at individual sites. We will model the probability of a land-use change as a function of several variables that define the time a site has been dedicated to its current use and previous uses, as well as its locational and market attributes. Models will be estimated using limited dependent variable approaches (e.g. multinomial logit, see Maddala 1983) and hypothesis tests will be completed using standard chi-squared tests for full and constrained models. Historical data will be developed from intensive sampling at "legacy" sites, i.e., ones which have been identified for intensive analyses of human use over the past century. These sites will also be used to study the effects of land-use history on terrestrial biodiversity (II.C.1).
II.B.3.b. Test for recent structural changes in patterns of land-use related to increased recreational and aesthetic values and the relative importance of market and nonmarket factors in land-use choice
Previous work indicates significant changes in patterns of choices for "wooded setting" home locations that are not entirely explained by topography and location relative to market and service centers (Turner et al., in press). We posit that these changes may also be related to proximity of parcels to aesthetic resources, e.g. mountain views, and to public lands and that these factors may be increasingly important for determining where future development will occur in the region. Hypothesis tests will require expanding logit models of land use states to incorporate these variables. Estimates of marginal effects coefficients will provide a means of comparing the relative effects of market (central place) proximity and aesthetic attributes. We will focus this analysis on the Little Tennessee and French Broad River Basin sites defined through the augmentation research.
II.B.3.c. Develop predictive models to forecast the likely location of future land-use changes
By focusing attention on that portion of the landscape that is most likely to change due to, for example, their proximity to markets as well as to aesthetic resources, we may be able to define where landscape conditions may become limiting for providing essential habitats and environmental services. We will apply land-use state models developed under objective 2) to parcels described in the regional GIS to estimate the probability of a change to a different land use. Probabilities of change will then be mapped.
The goal of all the projects described above is to link historic land uses in the southern Appalachians to current day terrestrial and aquatic diversity. In addition, predictive models of future land use change will be linked with both population and C cycling studies/models to predict the potential effects of future land use change on biodiversity and C storage, respectively (Sections II.C and II.D).
II.C. Effects of disturbance and
environmental heterogeneity on populations and communities
This part of the research focuses on four key issues: 1) the effects of disturbance, specifically land use change, on terrestrial and aquatic diversity, 2) the effects of environmental heterogeneity (biotic and abiotic) on the population ecology of animal and plant species, 3) the potential for heterogeneous animal and plant populations to generate further environmental variability of ecological significance, and 4) the effects of human disturbance superimposed on environmental heterogeneity at landscape scales. We attempt to link these issues with ecosystem processes at watershed and regional scales (II.D).
The re-emergence of metapopulation dynamics, the development of spatially-explicit population models, and the importance of spatial distributions for conservation ecology are key issues in the ecological literature (Pulliam 1988, Stewart-Oaten and Murdoch 1990, Gilpin and Hanski 1991, Doak and Mills 1994). At the regional scale (II.C.1 and II.C.2), we focus on how human land use affects diversity of terrestrial and aquatic communities and we propose to develop predictive models of potential future changes. For studies of environmental heterogeneity we focus on the Coweeta basin because: a) it has a well-defined elevation gradient with established gradient sampling plots; b) there are a series of nested watersheds that vary in elevation and aspect; c) histories of recent natural and anthropogenic disturbances are well documented; and d) a large data base exists that includes distributions and abundances of many key organisms.
The following proposed studies are linked by the common goal of understanding the causes and consequences of disturbance and environmental heterogeneity for the population and community ecology of animals and plants in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. These studies incorporate spatial variation in factors as diverse as soil moisture, foliage chemistry, forest community composition, and stream substratum disturbance. They further measure the responses to disturbance and environmental heterogeneity in organisms as diverse as small mammals, fish, birds, insect herbivores, oribatid mites, vegetation, and stream invertebrates. There are fundamental questions in common to all of these projects, and together they address the overall importance of a spatially-complex environment for the population and community ecology of species in general, within the overriding theme of natural and anthropogenic disturbance.
II.C.1. Disturbance history, land-use, and impacts on biodiversity at various spatial scales
(Bolstad,Pearson, and Turner)
The importance of human land-use for explaining the patterns of biotic diversity observed in today's landscapes has been recognized recently (e.g. Glitzenstein et al. 1990, Foster 1992, Turner et al., in press). The field studies we initiated in 1995 with the augmentation funding focused on one effect of human land-use activities: the fragmentation of native habitats into smaller patches, on vascular plants and breeding birds in mesic cove forests. Two other factors are likely to explain substantial variability in the plant and animal communities. First, even within small forest fragments, the natural sources of environmental heterogeneity are important. Second, the past use(s) of the forest (e.g. logging, agriculture, pasture) or the occurrence of natural disturbances appear to have a strong influence on both biotic and abiotic components of the environment at a variety of spatial scales. We will continue our studies of the effects of land-use on the native biota, expand our work to other taxa (arthropods, mammals and salamanders, in conjunction with Laerm and Crossley) and explore the mechanisms underlying the effects of habitat fragmentation and land-use on the plant communities. Using a combination of field and modeling studies, we will investigate interaction between life-history strategies and habitat fragmentation that affect species diversity and abundances.
Our study addresses four questions: 1) How does the legacy of land-use affect community composition in forest patches? 2) Do land-use practices change the spatial scale of heterogeneity of the biota within forest patches as compared to undisturbed forest patches? 3) In forest fragments, how do within- and between-patch heterogeneity interact with species life-history traits to determine presence and abundance of forest herbs? and 4) How does species abundance and diversity vary in naturally occurring patches in relatively undisturbed portions of the forest landscape? Coweeta offers unique opportunities to address these questions because of the detailed (and growing) knowledge of disturbance history at the site. Previous land-use data from both within and beyond the Coweeta drainage basin (logging, farming, etc.) will be used as a template on which to superimpose current plant assemblages, to compare the variance in assemblages within and among disturbance categories, and as the basis for predicting how environmental perturbation influences recruitment and mortality processes.
During the coming six years, we will establish study areas within 10 forest patches of similar size in which the land-use history can be determined back to the late 1800's (legacy sites). Five sites will have remained in a forested state since the late 1800's (although they may have been grazed or selectively logged) and five sites will have been previously cultivated but have returned to forest. Land-use and disturbance history back to the 1930's will be obtained by analysis of historic aerial photographs. County records (e.g. family histories, tax records, deed descriptions) will be used to extend the history back as far as possible. Vascular plants and birds will be sampled in these 10 "legacy" sites by using the same sampling techniques being used under the augmentation work. This sampling includes characterization of the environmental heterogeneity (soils, slope, aspect, elevation) within the patches. The data obtained from these legacy sites will provide a detailed understanding of how past land-use interacts with natural patterns of heterogeneity to structure the present-day communities.
An essential complement to our field studies is the development of spatially-explicit models of how populations respond to landscape-scale habitat changes. We have already developed rule-based models that describe the spatial distribution of suitable habitat across the landscape for individual species (Pearson et al., in preparation). A model developed under current funding integrates species' life-history characteristics in a spatial context to permit dynamic simulation of populations across heterogeneous and changing landscapes. The model provides a broader-scale context for our field studies and will permit evaluation of impacts on species of alternative land-use and fragmentation patterns overlaid on natural environmental heterogeneity. Especially in the Little Tennessee drainage, where development is presently much less extensive than in the French Broad, this work provides a mechanism to evaluate plausible development scenarios. This work complements the efforts on understanding the effects on environmental heterogeneity on communities (II.B.2) and on understanding and predicting human land-use dynamics in the region.
II.C.2. Land-use and long-term change in aquatic ecosystems of the southern Appalachians
(Benfield, Helfman, Meyer, Pringle)
We propose to determine how land-use affects aquatic biota in the southern Appalachians, and to predict how future alterations to the landscape are likely to affect the form and function of its aquatic ecosystems. We will accomplish this by investigating current and historical patterns in land-use and aquatic biota in the French Broad (FB) and Little Tennessee (LT) River Basins, by examining the relation between current patterns of land-use and stream ecosystem function, and by experimentally manipulating sediment and its interaction with macrofauna and algae. Our hypotheses are 1) land-use affects aquatic biota in adjoining fluvial systems and responses are proportional to degree of disturbance (length and intensity); and 2) the impact of land-use on aquatic diversity results from sediment inputs. Changes in land-use practices that increase sedimentation in streams cause greater shifts in species composition and ecological function than do changes that stabilize or reduce sediment input. We propose four research approaches: 1) assessments of species composition and ecosystem function in streams draining regions with well-defined land-use types, 2) experiments to examine interactions among macrobiota, sediments and algae in streams draining regions with well-defined land-use types 3) an historical component involving resampling sites identified by searching museum and other records to determine the time-course over which changing land-use practices have an impact, and 4) experimental manipulation of sediment inputs.
II.C.2.a. Faunal assemblages and ecosystem function in streams draining regions of different land-use
This project extends current sampling of benthic macroinvertebrates and fishes and characterization of sediments in streams in the LT and FB basins, involving three small (3-4 order) and three large (5-6 order) streams draining either forested or agricultural watersheds in each basin (total = 24 streams). One rapidly expanding land-use type in the southern Appalachians is suburban, brought about by extensive construction of vacation and retirement homes. We have not addressed suburban impacts in our current sampling. Hence we propose to sample macroinvertebrates and fishes and characterize sediments in 6 streams draining suburban watersheds in each basin during years 1 and 2 using our current sampling protocol (Table 2). This will provide us with a data set on land-use and aquatic biota in 36 streams.
Our sampling involves stream reaches that flow through extensive patches of land cover types. However, we do not know how extensive a land cover patch must be to influence a stream. We propose to determine the areal extent and relative influence of different amounts of a land cover type. We will choose three watersheds with distinct forest/agriculture boundaries. We will sample twice annually a 50 m reach beginning 200 m upstream of this margin (forested region) and then successively at points beginning at the margin and at 100 m, 250 m, 500 m , and 1 km below the forest/agriculture boundary. GIS-based maps will help determine the agricultural acreage draining into the stream at the sampling points, allowing us to regress assemblage characteristics (e.g. density and diversity of fishes and invertebrates, proportions in different functional groups) against land cover area.
Stream biota are particularly vulnerable to sediment moving along the bottom as bedload, yet we have no measure of this. At the 36 sites described above, we will measure bedload movement seasonally using deadfall traps (Shen and Julien 1993). The amount of material collected in small containers placed in the stream bottom is a measure of bedload transport.
An integrative ecosystem function is one that involves interaction over several trophic levels. Organic matter decomposition in streams is such a response because it may involve fungi, bacteria, and macroinvertebrates. We have found leaves, woody debris, and various species of shredders in all streams sampled, indicating that allochthonous organic matter contributes to the energetics of these streams. We propose to measure stick decomposition as an integrated functional response to land-use in the 36 streams (Table 3). This is a natural extension of past LTER research on leaf and wood decay in Coweeta streams(Benfield et al. 1991, Tank et al. 1993). Sticks are preferable to leaves because sticks decay more slowly and are less susceptible to removal.
II.C.2.b. Interactions among biota and sediments in streams draining regions of different land-use
Increased sedimentation is a primary cause of biodiversity changes in streams (Waters 1995). Sediments and macrobiota (fish, shrimp) interact to influence standing crop and composition of algal periphyton assemblages in tropical streams of Puerto Rico and Costa Rica (Pringle et al. 1993, Pringle and Blake 1994, Pringle in press, Pringle and Hamazaki in review). In these streams macrobiota remove sediments and associated algae from benthic surfaces, often reducing total algal standing crop but enhancing the biovolume of understory algal taxa. In southern Appalachian streams, the interactions among macrobiota (fish, crayfish), sediments, and algae are not known, but are likely influenced by changes in land-use because of its impact on both light regime and sediment delivery to the channel. We propose to investigate these interactions in the FB and LT Rivers by excluding macrobiota from small (~0.5 m2) patches of stream bottom using an electric exclusion technique (Pringle and Blake 1994) that excludes macrobiota via continuous, non-lethal, electric pulses produced by 6-volt, solar-powered electric fences. Algal periphyton (AFDM, biovolume), sediment cover (DM), and insect densities will be sampled on clay tiles retrieved from treatments every 5 days throughout a 40 day experimental period during the summer. Sediment size fractions and bedload movement will be characterized. The 6-year plan of experiments is summarized in Table 4. In year 1 we will do exclusion experiments at the nine 3-4 order sites in LT. The interactions among sediments, macrobiota, and periphyton probably vary depending on current regime; therefore, in year 2 we will do an exclusion experiment in each of three habitats [pool (0 cm/s), riffle (25-35 cm/s), and run (2-5 cm/s)] in 3 streams draining pasture in the FB basin. In year 3, we will experimentally alter sediment load in Coweeta Creek to examine its interaction with macroconsumers and algae. In each of 3 runs, 3 replicates of each of the following treatments will be installed in a randomized block design: macrobiota present or absent in treatments with natural sedimentation, artificial sediment removal, and sediment augmentation. Artificial sediment removal will entail daily sediment removal by rapidly dipping tiles in and out of the water; and sediment augmentation will entail sprinkling stream bank sediments onto the surface of tiles daily at the highest rates measured in our bedload samplers. In years 4, 5, and 6 we will assess the interactive effects of nutrient enrichment, sediments, and macroconsumers in pasture or suburban streams in the LT and FB basins by combining electric exclosure experiments with an algal bioassay technique that employs nutrient-diffusing substrata (Tate 1990, Pringle and Triska in press).
II.C.2.c. Long-term patterns of change in aquatic biota
We propose to trace changes in land-use over time to see if changing land-use is important in determining biodiversity (macroinvertebrate and fish species composition and function) in streams. We will find watersheds that have been stable over the last 50 - 100 years (as pasture, rowcrops, and/or forest) and establish what appears to be characteristic, baseline communities. We can then compare these streams with those which have undergone radical land-use change. In addition we address the question of how long an area has to be subjected to a particular land-use type for changes in species or functional group composition to occur by resampling sites that were sampled decades ago and catalogued in museums or other collections. Numerous records of invertebrate collections in the region exist in student theses and state and federal government records. Historical museum records are proving absolutely invaluable for fishes. Using collection data bases from 9 museums, we have located over 30 collection locales (including species lists and relative abundances) in 2 counties that go back as far as 1888, with more frequent records from 1934 to the present. We propose to assimilate these records into a data base that can be combined with land-use records, and resample fauna at sites showing both little and extensive land-use change over the intervening period. If possible, we will include "legacy" sites.
II.C.2.d. Experimental manipulation of sediment inputs
To understand underlying mechanisms creating patterns of diversity and distribution, we propose experimental manipulations examining the influence of sediment load on life history and reproductive characteristics of LT fishes (Burkhead and Walsh 1995, Buckley and Bart 1995). In years 5 and 6, we will test a representative benthic species native to the area that responds to differences in sediment load (e.g. Etheostoma chlorobranchium ). We will construct 3 paired channels (0.5 m wide x 4 m long) in a Coweeta stream, and use these for experiments with added sediment. Response variables to be measured include direct mortality, growth rate, body condition, feeding rate, and reproductive output (gonosomatic index, egg number, and spawning success). We hypothesize that sediment reduces growth and reproductive rates of darters through 3 major effects: 1) an energy cost by filling in refuge sites, forcing animals to expend more energy to maintain position in the stream, 2) a feeding cost by reducing the amount of available habitat for stream invertebrates, and 3) a reproductive cost such as silting of spawning sites. If these trials are successful, we will also run them with a species that our data indicate does better in sediment-laden water, such as the mirror shiner, Notropis spectrunculus. Mechanistic analyses of the influence of sediment on southeastern fishes are sorely lacking (Waters 1995).
II.C.3. Linkages among spatial variation in plant quality, herbivore population dynamics, and soilprocesses (Hunter and Crossley)
We propose to investigate environmental heterogeneity at one level generating environmental heterogeneity at a second level by influencing the distribution of key intermediate species. More specifically, we hypothesize that heterogeneity in foliage quality for herbivores determines the spatial distribution of herbivores. The heterogeneous patterns of defoliation that result may influence soil processes by modifying inputs to the forest floor. Herbivory levels on canopy trees at Coweeta vary with elevation (Reynolds, 1995). Two key questions remain to be answered: 1) to what extent does spatial variation in the quality and availability of foliage explain patterns of herbivory along the elevation gradient? and 2) what are the effects of heterogeneous patterns of defoliation on the densities and activities of soil microarthropods?
II.C.3.a. Herbivory and plant quality
Two factors are critical determinants of densities of defoliating insects on oak worldwide. The phenology of oak budburst and leaf-fall influence herbivore densities among individual trees. Trees that leaf out early and drop foliage late often support the highest densities of defoliating insects (Hunter 1992). Second, concentrations of foliar phenolics influence herbivore densities among trees. High tannin concentrations result in low densities of leaf-chewing insects (Hunter 1996). Tree phenology and tannin concentrations for oak insects are unstudied along elevational gradients. Coweeta is ideal for this because: 1) oak foliage remains for four weeks longer at lower elevations than at higher elevations at Coweeta; 2) nutrient availability (which affects foliar phenolic concentrations) is known at five elevation gradient plots, and varies among plots (Griffith 1993); and 3) canopy walkways facilitate estimating herbivore population densities, herbivory levels, and foliage chemistry (Reynolds and Crossley 1995). Such research will be invaluable if and when the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) arrives in the Coweeta basin (probably before the year 2000). We will use a photographic method, calibrated during 1995 (Hunter, Reynolds) to estimate budburst dates from 10 individual trees of each of 3 important canopy tree species at Coweeta (Quercus rubra, Q. prinus and Acer rubrum). Photographs of expanding buds, taken weekly and scanned from slides onto a computer, can be used to measure bud and leaf expansion and to estimate the date of 50% leaf expansion. Budburst estimates will be made in this way at each of the five gradient plots (10 trees x 3 species x 5 plots = 150 trees photographed each week for 6 weeks during leaf expansion). Measures of phenolic chemistry will be made from the same 150 trees once each month from full leaf expansion to leaf-fall. Briefly, branches will be collected by a combination of shotgun sampling and collection from canopy walkways. Leaf disks will be punched directly from leaves into methanol, and partitioned for analysis by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and by sequential extraction in methanol, ethanol, and acetone. HPLC analysis is used for simple phenolics, depsides, and flavonoids. Sequential extraction provides an estimate of total phenolics, including tannins (Waterman and Mole 1994). Herbivore densities and herbivory will be estimated monthly from a subset of trees that are accessible from canopy walkways (methods in Hunter 1992, 1994). Correlation techniques, within and among gradient plots, will be used to associate herbivore densities and herbivory with budburst and foliar chemistry.
II.C.3.b. Herbivory and soil processes
Canopy defoliation results in a variety of inputs into soils via insect frass, modified stem- and through-fall, and green-fall. For example, Crossley et al. (1988) reported large inputs of ammonium and phosphate to forest floors, and nitrates to a stream following an insect outbreak (Alsophila pometaria) at Coweeta. Litter arthropod diversity and abundance may increase following defoliation events (Schowalter and Sabin 1991). Although herbivory may have a dramatic effect on nutrient availability and decomposition in soils, the relationships between canopy herbivory and soil processes are poorly known in forest systems. The elevation gradient at Coweeta provides an opportunity to study the effects of spatial heterogeneity in defoliation levels on soil microarthropod abundance and decomposition. We will collect frass in funnel traps by opening 12 traps at each gradient plot for 4 hours of daylight and 4 hours of darkness once each month from leaf expansion through leaf-fall (12 traps x 5 plots = 60 samples per month). These will be used for estimates of frass fall, and related to herbivore densities (above). An additional 12 through-fall traps, adjacent to the frass traps, will be used to assess the effects of herbivory on ammonium and phosphate concentrations in through-fall (again, correlated with herbivore densities and defoliation). The abundance and diversity of oribatid mites will be measured monthly in 12 individual 1m2 quadrats directly adjacent to the frass and through-fall traps in each gradient plot. Litter-fall traps already established at each site will be used to estimate green-fall (portions of leaves dropped during defoliation by herbivores). During the first 3 years of the project, estimates of frass-fall, green-fall, and through-fall will be made for each plot, as described. During the second 3 years of the study, we will manipulate experimentally the frass-fall, green-fall, and throughfall into quadrats (using data from the first 3 years to establish appropriate quantities for manipulation). Quadrats will receive either half or double the average input of frass (group 1), green-fall (group 2), or through-fall (group 3) and compared with controls (group 4). Each treatment (and controls) will be replicated 6 times per plot. The response of oribatid mite density and diversity to experimental manipulation of herbivore-derived inputs will be measured monthly in each experimental quadrat during the second 3 years of the project. Overall, we will use correlation and analysis of variance techniques to establish the effects of natural (sampling) and experimental (manipulated) additions of herbivore-derived inputs for soil arthropod abundance and diversity.
II.C.4. Environmental heterogeneity and community dynamics (Clark, Clinton, Elliott, Grossman,Laerm, McNulty, Swift, and Yeakley)
Questions of spatial scale dominate the current ecological literature (Kareiva 1994, Tilman 1994). The following three studies consider the effects of environmental heterogeneity on community composition at very different spatial scales, and question the degree to which we can generalize about the mechanisms structuring communities among those scales. In addition, the studies have an implicit temporal component; at what rates do communities respond to natural and anthropogenic disturbance (i.e. increased heterogeneity) and does it vary among spatial scales?
II.C.4.a. Effects of spatial and temporal environmental heterogeneity on stream fish assemblages
We propose to measure effects of spatial and temporal environmental heterogeneity on fish assemblage structure. We will continue to monitor assemblage structure in the three 100m gradient sites established previously, and will extend our sampling downstream to at least one site with greater diversity (i.e. > 20 species). Fish samples will be taken once or twice yearly as per Freeman et al. (1988). We will quantify fish abundance, population structure, and physical measurements such as substratum composition, water temperature, and gage height (see Freeman et al. 1988, and Grossman et al. 1995). These data will be used to assess assemblage stability sensu Grossman et al. (1990) and determine the effects of temporal heterogeneity in the physical environment on assemblage stability and population structure of individual species. In addition, because several species (e. g. mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdii, longnose dace, Rhinichthys cataractae, and rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss) are present in at least two gradient sites with differing physical characteristics (Grossman et al. 1995), we will also assess the potential effects of spatial heterogeneity on population structure of these species. Finally, a second five years of data will enable us to examine the relative importance of density-dependent and density-independent processes on population regulation in these species. This information is almost nonexistent for stream fishes, especially non-game species (Grossman et al. 1990, Grossman et al. 1995). We also propose to use a landscape approach to elucidate factors controlling the distribution and abundance of mottled sculpin in the Coweeta basin. Mottled sculpin numerically dominate many streams across northern North America. This species also has a small home range (<0.5 m2, Freeman & Stouder 1989). Although most abundant in riffles, mottled sculpin are microhabitat generalists (Grossman & Freeman 1987). In fact during and after the drought of 1985-1988, the microhabitat distribution of this species did not differ significantly from random (Grossman et al., unpublished data). Sculpin occupied patches that had prey abundances significantly higher than randomly selected patches (Petty and Grossman 1996), suggesting that prey distribution is driving microhabitat use by sculpin. We will expand this approach to broader spatial scales, to determine the relative importance of physical factors and prey abundance on the distribution and abundance of this species across reaches of Shope Fork. We will measure the availability of physical variables in reaches (as defined by Hill and Grossman 1987) using the methods of Grossman & Freeman (1987) and take a minimum of five benthic samples from riffles. We will then test for correlations between sculpin abundances and physical parameters (e.g. depth, velocity, substratum composition, photosynthetically active radiation) across reaches, as well as prey abundance. Both univariate and multivariate statistics will be used to examine these relationships (Grossman and De Sostoa 1994).
II.C.4.b. Disturbance and heterogeneity as determinants of species richness of animal assemblages
Small mammal (soricid and rodent) and amphibian communities at Coweeta and elsewhere in the southern Appalachians differ significantly in species richness, and evenness both within and between representative vegetational cover types (Ford et al. 1994, Laerm et al. 1996, Laerm et al., in press). Perturbation history may also influence richness and evenness. The research proposed here will focus on three aspects of the determinants of regional patterns of biodiversity of small mammal and salamander assemblages: 1) How do richness, and evenness vary within and between vegetational cover types ( spruce-fir, northern hardwood, cove hardwood, oak- hickory, oak-pine, and rhododendron riparian zones)? 2) How does spatial variation in habitat structure influence biodiversity? This will be examined through correlation of habitat characteristics (elevation, aspect, coarse woody debris, soil moisture, soil-type, and vegetation diversity) with patterns of richness, and evenness; and 3) Does perturbation history influence richness, and evenness? This will be tested by comparisons among original growth, mature (80-I00 year old), mid-successional (40-60 year) and young (0-10 years) stands of several representative cover types described under 1) and 2) above. We will use standardized Jollie-Siebert mark-release recapture methodology (Ford et al. 1994) for estimating small mammal densities. Amphibians will be estimated by direct observation, based on transects, and visual time-searches. Comparisons of relative abundances will be based on drift-fences, using pitfall sampling.
II.C.4.c. Site factors, plant life-history traits, and gap studies
Most recent explanations for coexistence of diverse forest assemblages invoke tradeoffs between the ability of plant species to colonize sites versus their ability to hold them (Tilman 1994, Pacala and Tilman 1994, Clark and Ji 1995). Both colonization and site retention will depend upon intrinsic attributes of the species and physical factors at the site. Spatial variation in physical factors will interact with species attributes to determine species composition at any point in space and time. This study has two goals: 1) to describe interactions between spatially-heterogeneous site factors and the life history traits of plants at different life stages that ultimately determine the ability of species to colonize and retain sites, and 2) by understanding how environmental variability and life history traits combine to determine forest assemblages, results should allow the prediction of how assemblages might change following modification in the environment by forces such global change. The elevation gradient at Coweeta is an excellent resource for this study; by determining the life history stages that limit populations of key species at different locations along the gradient, using experimental approaches, such as creating canopy gaps, this study will show both where and how these species are sensitive to changes in the environment.
The three-year pretreatment phase of gap experiments was completed in 1993 and girdling of trees implemented in August/September 1994. Experimental gaps included three with and three without Rhododendron understories on both low- and high-elevation mixed oak stands, for a total of 12 gaps. Data collected on temperature, soil moisture, N mineralization, seedling censuses, seedling physiology, and tree growth rates since 1991 constitute the pretreatment baselines for experimental effects that began with the 1995 growing season. Most girdled trees did not leaf out in 1995, so responses of physical factors, N mineralization, and seedling physiology are expected to have begun in 1995/1996. Seedling dynamic responses and tree-growth responses may not be observable until 1996. Following tree recruitment, successful colonization and the species composition that eventually fill a gap may be determined by the species with the greatest resource use efficiency under that particular set of resource availabilities. Differences among species in resource use efficiency may play a significant role in their relative abilities to tolerate variation in the availability of key resources such as nitrogen, water, and light.
To investigate the importance of resource use efficiencies as an adaptive life history strategy, we propose to examine the relationships among resource use efficiencies and availabilities of four understory tree species (Acer rubrum L., Quercus prinus L., Quercus coccinea Muenchh., and Quercus rubra L.) that naturally occur in these artificially created gaps. Because forest gaps can alter resource availability, the temporal and spatial patterns of gaps interact with species strategies for growth and survival. Species response to this change will vary with the magnitude, rate, and persistence of the resource change and with the life histories and resource requirements of the organisms that colonize the gaps. Pre-treatment measurements suggest that high elevation oaks have higher rates of net photosynthesis (PN: 67, 64, and 77% higher for Q. prinus, Q. coccinea, and Q. rubra, respectively) than low elevation oaks and there is a difference among oaks within an elevation. However, if there is a difference in leaf duration between elevations, then the difference in total carbon gain over a growing season may not be as dramatic as suggested by PN data alone. In order to evaluate this total carbon gain for understory tree species it is important to understand the phenological development at both the high and low elevation sites. We propose to follow and record dates of important phenological development (i.e. bud swell, bud burst, leaf expansion, leaf color, and leaf abscission) of understory trees through the growing season at both elevations.
Seedling demographic data thus far suggest that seed production and dispersal are much less limiting than is germination success due to seed predators and other, as yet, undetermined factors. Highest percentages of first-yr seedling densities to seed rain densities are for Acer and Liriodendron, at 0.5 to 4.0% and 0.01 to 0.06%, respectively. The greatest bottleneck for tree recruitment thus appears to lie first in establishment success and, secondarily, in seed arrival (Clark et al., in review).
To investigate seed and seedling predation on tree recruitment, mammal exclosures were installed in gap plots in 1994. Twenty four 1 x 2 m exclosures and 12 control plots were established, in gap (3) and non-gap (3) areas of Rhododendron and non-Rhododendron locations. Exclosures were of two mesh sizes: 1) to exclude deer but not rodents (hogwire), and 2) impermeable to rodents and deer (hardware cloth). Preliminary experiments on seed predation show complete removal of Quercus in all treatments (to squirrels, because all exclosures were open at the top), heavy losses of Fagus above and below litter to insect damage, and no effects on Liriodendron. These preliminary results suggest recruitment might be strongly limited by seed predation for Quercus (squirrels) and Fagus, but not for Liriodendron. The fraction of removed Quercus that are planted elsewhere is not known, but we plan surveys to assess whether new first-year seedlings result from planted vs. surface germinants.
If canopy gaps and presence of Rhododendron are important controls of forest dynamics in the southern Appalachians, then we expect these variables to respond to canopy losses that began in 1995. Monitoring of changes in light, moisture, temperature, and mineralization provides the necessary environmental factors that contribute to those responses. During the new funding period we will continue censuses, measurements, and sampling at intervals used for the pretreatment phase. Pre- and post-treatment data are thus comparable, and comparisons with understory controls permit hypothesis tests of gap effects.
II.D. Effects of disturbance and environmental heterogeneity on biogeochemical cycling and ecosystem processes
Understanding biogeochemical cycles and ecosystem processes in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems has been a key element of Coweeta's LTER research activities. Early research emphasized the role of severe disturbance (e.g. clearcutting, drought) and the resultant impacts on nutrient, carbon, and hydrologic cycles. In the most recent grant period, we investigated the role of environmental heterogeneity, disturbance/stress, and their interaction in regulating ecosystem pools and processes in streams, riparian zones, and forests. The research proposed here includes continuation of measurements of select topics initiated in previous LTER grants and new research which builds on past studies. Our approach will be to address ecosystem process response to environmental heterogeneity and disturbance/stress at several spatial scales: in plots, in watersheds, in landscapes (Coweeta basin), and in the southern Appalachian region (Figure 13). This will be accomplished through an integrated program of long-term field measurements, experimentation, and modeling.
II.D.1. Stream ecosystems (Benfield, Meyer, Wallace, Webster)
Most streams in the eastern U.S. begin in forests and are dominated by allochthonous inputs. As width increases downstream, light to the streambed increases, allochthonous inputs are lower, and the stream becomes more autochthonous based (Vannote et al. 1980). Over the past 5 years, much of our effort in the LTER has been directed towards study of the first to fourth order continuum within the Coweeta basin. Our results have not shown strong changes along this continuum that can be attributed to increasing stream size (see I.B.4.). Instead, specific geomorphological characteristics of a site (e.g. pool, riffle, run) are more important in determining functional and community characteristics. Further downstream, stream-size characteristics become much more important (Grubaugh et al., in press); however, even in the Little Tennessee River, there are areas of riffle that have macroinvertebrate communities more typical of riffles in headwaters than mid-order streams. Over a 60-km stream continuum, where annual degree days increased by 50% and discharge increase 3000-fold, habitat-weighted secondary production of benthos increased from < 10 to > 150 g AFDM/m2/yr, among the highest values ever recorded (Grubaugh 1994). In addition to large changes in production, there were large changes in taxa over the gradient. These stream size trends can be overridden by anthropogenic disturbance; e.g., Ward and Stanford (1983) showed that a dam can reset a stream to conditions more similar to those found upstream. In the Little Tennessee River, human land use seems to have the opposite effect; effects of sediment inputs, elevated nutrients, and lack of riparian shading create conditions more typical of larger streams.
The stream research proposed is centered on the observation that there are biotic assemblages associated with habitat types within the stream (Huryn and Wallace 1987, Naiman 1988, Gregory et al. 1991). We recognize several habitat types within any reach of stream: riffles, runs, depositional zones, bedrock chutes, and channel expansion zones (i.e. areas wet only during storms) that characterize small headwater streams. Downstream, areas of specific habitat types get larger, depositional zones become pools, and channel expansion zones become floodplains. New habitat types, such as macrophyte beds, may become increasingly important, and the habitat types found within a reach of stream will also reflect land use in the watershed.
Our new research is designed to answer two questions: How do stream size, in-stream habitat types, and riparian land use vary along a 1st to 7th order stream gradient? How are organic matter sources, in-stream organic matter dynamics and invertebrate communities affected by stream size, habitat types, and riparian land use along this gradient? In addition to this new research, we will continue our ongoing studies that address long-term recovery of stream processes and invertebrate communities from watershed (clear-cutting) and site specific (log addition) disturbances. These studies (II.D.1.b) address the question: what is the long-term (decadal) pattern of recovery from disturbance for organic matter dynamics (inputs, storage and decomposition) and invertebrate communities in southern Appalachian headwater streams? In combination with the regional stream research (II.C.2), these studies will enable us to analyze the long-term response of stream ecosystems to anthropogenic disturbance in the context of longitudinal gradients of change along a stream continuum.
II.D.1.a. Variation in carbon dynamics and use by animal communities along environmental disturbance gradients
Our objective in the following studies is to characterize the habitat types of the Ball Creek - Coweeta Creek - Little Tennessee river system in terms of their functional and community structural characteristics and their relationships to the stream-size continuum, site-specific geomorphological characteristics, and land use. To address the questions outlined above, we propose the following studies:
II.D.1.a.(1). Geomorphological survey of the stream continuum. We have completed a physical survey of over 13 km from Ball Creek to the confluence of Coweeta Creek with the Little Tennessee River. We propose to continue this survey about 50 km down the Little Tennessee to Fontana Reservoir. At 100 m intervals, we will measure width, bankfull width, flood plain width, mean depth, extent of riparian vegetation, substrate composition, and coverage of aquatic macrophytes. This survey will be completed during year 1.
II.D.1.a.(2). Site selection. Intensive studies will be conducted at four sites. The first is a 3rd order site on Ball Creek sampled in our previous research (Figure 2). The next three will be selected from among the sites previously used by Grubaugh (1994) and will include the 5th order site on Coweeta Creek.
II.D.1.a.(3). Riparian inputs of allochthonous organic material. During year 2, litterfall inputs to small streams will be sampled by suspending litter traps over the stream. At the larger river sites we will place litter traps in the riparian area and use the fraction of the annually inundated area covered by riparian vegetation to estimate allochthonous input. The estimates will vary depending on the extent and timing of floods within a particular year.
II.D.1.a.(4). Primary production . We will measure primary production at each site using the upstream-downstream diurnal oxygen change technique (e.g., Bott 1996). This technique has been extensively used in larger streams in eastern US (reviewed by Webster et al. 1995) and has recently been modified for use in smaller streams (Marzolf et al. 1994). This technique will allow us to measure both primary production and community respiration. Measurements will be made at each site five times per year during year 3.
II.D.1.a.(5). Seston transport. Other than direct allochthonous inputs and in-stream primary production, the other source of organic matter to heterotrophic organisms in a stream is organic matter transported from upstream. During year 4 of the study, we will estimate seston transport at each site. Samples will be collected every two weeks for non-storm transport. Seasonally we will collect samples during storms and determine both organic and inorganic particle transport. Streamflow at non-gaged sites will be estimated from drainage area and flow at gauged sites.
II.D.1.a.(6). Trophic basis of secondary production. Benthic macroinvertebrates will be collected seasonally at each site and foregut contents mounted on slides, identified, digitized and summarized as described by Wallace et al. (1987). We will examine how resources (seston composition, benthic organic matter, and primary production) vary seasonally along the stream size and elevational gradient. With gut analyses, we can determine how food resources (i.e., detritus, fungi, algae, and animal) ingested by the dominant taxa within various functional groups vary seasonally over the gradient. Using the procedure of Benke and Wallace (1980) and our measures of secondary production at these sites (Grubaugh 1994), we will be able to assess how the trophic basis of production varies over the gradient.
II.D.1.a.(7). Role of the aquatic macrophyte Podostemum in structuring the invertebrate community. Secondary production of aquatic invertebrates within dense growths of Podostemum ceratophyllum at downstream sites in the LittleTennesee River are among the highest reported for aquatic invertebrates. We will investigate the importance of Podostemum to invertebrate community structure by comparing seasonal benthic abundances and biomass of taxa in functional groups on cobble and bedrock substrates where Podostemum has previously been manually removed (by scraping and brushing) with substrates containing unmanipulated Podostemum. We predict distinct shifts in benthic abundances and biomass of taxa (i.e., from filterers to predominantly scrapers) and lower abundances and biomass of benthos in areas where the Podostemum has been removed.
II.D.1.b. Long-term studies of disturbance in Coweeta streams
The following ongoing studies address long-term responses to disturbance. We have been following recovery of a stream from clear-cut logging for two decades. We have also begun a long-term woody debris manipulation (Wallace et al., in press) where we continue to follow changes in abiotic factors and invertebrate community structure and biomass.
II.D.1.b.(1). Recovery of streams from watershed logging. Since 1975 we have been studying the effects of logging on Big Hurricane Branch (e.g. Webster et al. 1992). During year 5 we will remeasure the following processes in Big Hurricane Branch and Hugh White Creek (reference stream): litter inputs, leaf decomposition, benthic organic matter, stream invertebrates, and seston transport.
II.D.1.b.(2). Long-term studies of large woody debris addition to a stream ecosystem. We propose to continue our annual sampling for benthic invertebrates at 3 experimental sites (large woody debris addition) and 3 reference sites (cobble riffles) on Cunningham Creek (Wallace et al., in press). These sites were sampled seasonally from 1988 until 1992, when an annual sampling regime was initiated. These data are providing valuable long-term records of invertebrate abundances and biomass at manipulated and reference sites.
II.D.2. Riparian ecosystems (Yeakley, Coleman, Fitzgerald, Haines, Knoepp, Meyer)
Riparian zones represent the linkage between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems in the landscape; however, little is known about the delineation and function of riparian zones at Coweeta. Water and nutrients exported from the upslope areas pass through the riparian zone and hence, riparian zone nutrient cycling processes are inextricably linked to stream water chemistry. In addition, riparian zones at Coweeta are dominated by rosebay Rhododendron (Rhodendron maximum) which we hypothesize exerts a major influence on riparian zone function. This component of th