P-IIB1. Faunal
assemblages and ecosystem function in streams of different land-use
Summary: This project extends the current sampling of
benthic
macroinvertebrates,
fishes and characterization of sediments in streams draining
from either forested or agricultural watersheds, to include streams draining
from suburban
watersheds.
This has been done to address the rapidly expanding
suburban land-use type in the southern
Appalachians, brought about by extensive construction of vacation and
retirement homes.
Our sampling involves stream reaches that flow through extensive patches of
land cover types. We are determining how extensive a land cover patch
must be to influence a stream. By choosing watersheds with distinct
agricultural boundaries we can determine the
areal extent and
relative influence of different amounts of a land cover type.
An integrative ecosystem function is one that involves interaction over
several
trophic levels.
Organic matter decomposition in streams is
an example of this interaction because it may involve fungi, bacteria, and
macroinvertebrates. By
measuring stick decomposition as an integrated functional response to
land-use, we can achieve an indication of the
allochthonous organic matter
that contributes to stream energetics (Benfield et al. 1991, Tank et al.
1993).
Stream biota are also particularly vulnerable to sediment moving along the bottom
as
bedload. Seasonal bedload movement is accounted for by using
deadfall traps (Shen and
Julien 1993).
We synthesized breakdown and transport of
allochthonous detritus from many Coweeta stream studies, and demonstrated
that leaves generally break down near where they enter streams at a rate
predicable from
litterbag measurements (Webster et al. 2000). Fine
particles of organic matter, however, travel long distances before being
metabolized (Webster et al. 1999). We also found that small streams are very
efficient in retaining dissolved inorganic nitrogen (Tank et al.2000,
Peterson et al. 2001). Flood entrainment of floodplain
detritus is a
measurable source of organic matter in the middle reaches of the Little
Tennessee River, but is nevertheless small compared to leaf fall and
in-stream primary production (Neatrour 1999).
P-IIB2.
Interactions among biota and sediments in streams of different land-use
Summary: In southern
Appalachian streams, the interactions among macro biota (fish, crayfish),
sediments, and algae are not known, but are likely influenced by changes in
land-use because of its impact on both light regime and sediment delivery to
the channel; this research seeks to understand these interactions.
Increased sedimentation is a primary cause of
biodiversity changes in
streams (Waters 1995). Sediments and macro biota (fish, shrimp) interact to
influence standing crop and composition of
algal periphyton assemblages in
tropical streams of Puerto Rico and Costa Rica (Pringle et al. 1993, Pringle
and Blake 1994, Pringle in press, Pringle and Hamazaki in review). In these
streams, macro biota remove sediments and associated algae from benthic
surfaces, often reducing total algal standing crop but enhancing the
bio-volume of understory algal taxa. In southern Appalachian streams, the
interactions among macro biota (fish, crayfish), sediments, and algae are not
known, but are likely influenced by changes in land-use because of its
impact on both light regime and sediment delivery to the channel. This
project investigates these interactions by excluding macro biota from small (~0.5 m2) patches of stream bottom using an electric
exclusion technique (Pringle and Blake 1994) that excludes macro biota via
continuous, non-lethal, electric pulses produced by 6-volt, solar-powered
electric fences.
In year 1
exclusion experiments were done at the nine sites in Little
Tennessee Basin (LT). The interactions
among sediments, macro biota, and periphyton may vary depending on
current regime; therefore, in year 2 we did an exclusion experiment in
each of three habitats [pool (0 cm/s),
riffle (25-35 cm/s), and
run (2-5
cm/s)] in 3 streams draining pasture in the French Broad (FB) basin. In year 3, we experimentally altered sediment load in Coweeta Creek to examine its
interaction with macro-consumers and algae. In each of 3 runs, 3 replicates
of each of the following treatments were installed in a randomized block
design: macro biota present or absent in treatments with natural
sedimentation, artificial sediment removal, and sediment augmentation. In years 4, 5, and 6 we assess the interactive effects of nutrient enrichment, sediments, and macro-consumers in pasture or suburban streams in the LT and FB basins by
combining electric exclosure experiments with an algal bioassay technique
that employs nutrient-diffusing substrata (Tate 1990, Pringle and Triska in
press).
The 6-year plan of experiments is summarized
| Year |
Basin |
No. of Streams |
Land-use |
Treatments (Number of each
Treatment) |
| 1996 |
LT |
9 |
Forest, Pasture, Suburban |
Reference (27) and
Macrobiota Exclusion (27) |
| 1997 |
FB |
3 habitats in 3 Streams |
Pasture |
Reference (27) and
Macrobiota Exclusion (27) in pool, riffle, or run |
| 1998 |
LT |
3 Runs |
Forested |
Reference (18), Sediment
Removed (18) and Sediment Added (18) with vs. w-out Macrobiota |
| 1999 |
LT |
3 Runs |
Pasture |
Reference (18), and
Added N + P (18) with vs. w-out Macrobiota |
| 2000 |
FB |
3 Runs |
Pasture |
Reference (18), and
Added N + P (18) with vs. w-out Macrobiota |
| 2001 |
LT |
3 Runs |
Suburban |
Reference (18), and
Added N + P (18) with vs. w-out Macrobiota |
Chlorophyll A and ash free dry mass were higher,
and aquatic insect larvae were larger (>4 mm) in exclusion than control
areas of both streams. We concluded that macrobiota influence the structure
of southern Appalachian benthic communities by (a)decreasing the amount of
organic matter (algae and detritus) available for other consumers, and (b)
preferentially preying on certain sizes and taxa of invertebrates (Schofield
2001).
P-IIB3. Long-term patterns of change in
aquatic biota
Summary: We are tracing changes in land-use over time to see if changing
land-use is important in determining biodiversity (macroinvertebrate and
fish species composition and function) in streams.
Using watersheds
that have been stable over the last 50 - 100 years (as pasture, row crops,
and/or forest) we have established what appears to be characteristic,
baseline
communities to compare to streams that have
undergone radical land-use change. In addition, we are addressing the question of
how long an area has to be subjected to a particular land-use type for
changes in species or functional group composition to occur by re-sampling
sites that were sampled decades ago and catalogued in museums or other
collections. Using collection data bases from 9 museums, we have
located over 30 collection locales (including species lists and relative
abundances) in 2 counties that go back as far as 1888, with more frequent
records from 1934 to the present. By assimilating these records into a data base that can be combined
with land-use records, fauna is then re-sampled at sites showing both
little and extensive land-use change over the intervening period.
The current invertebrate and fish diversity of aquatic
communities is best predicted by land use in the 1950s, indicating that past
land use and in particular agriculture produces long term modifications in
aquatic systems regardless of reforestation. Land use in the 1970s explains
the current ratios of endemic to cosmopolitan species (Scott and Helfman
2001) while fish density and diversity are affected by upstream than
streamside deforestation (Jones et al. 1999). The "legacy effect" and
upstream effects point to the importance of large-scale and long-term
restoration, and suggest that localized efforts may contribute little
(Harding et al. 1998). A surprising finding was that upland areas of high
fish
endemism are being invaded, displaced, and homogenized by native
species, not by exotics. Native invaders capitalize on habitat degradation
from changes in land use. Since traditional metrics of stream integrity
overlook native invasion, the early signs of stream ecosystem deterioration
may be similarly overlooked (Scott 2001, Scott and Helfman 2001, Scott et
al. in review).
P-IIB4. Experimental manipulation of sediment inputs
Summary:
To understand underlying mechanisms creating patterns of diversity and
distribution, we are experimentally manipulating the influence
of sediment load on life history and reproductive characteristics of LT
fishes (Burkhead and Walsh 1995, Buckley and Bart 1995).
In 2000 and 2001,
we tested a representative benthic species native to the area that
responds to differences in sediment load (e.g. Etheostoma chlorobranchium ).
Three paired channels were constructed (0.5 m wide x 4 m long) in a Coweeta
stream, and used in experiments with added sediment. We hypothesized that sediment reduces growth
and reproductive rates of darters ( a native fish species) through 3 major effects:
1) an energy cost
by filling in refuge sites, forcing animals to expend more energy to
maintain position in the stream,
2) a feeding cost by reducing the amount of
available habitat for stream invertebrates, and
3) a reproductive cost such
as
silting of
spawning sites.
Investigators and Collaborators:
Fred Benfield
Gene
Helfman
Judy Meyer
Katherine Pringle
Previous
(P-IIA) |
Next
(P-IIC)
|